The author posted a question in Science, Technology, Languages
I am a person. You are not me. So you're not human? and got a better answer
Response from
The first sentence is an assertion. The second is a negation. The correct conclusion cannot be drawn from them. There must be either assertions or double negations, or a combination of both. This is a necessary condition for the correctness of the conclusion. Otherwise, logic is violated?
Response from 0[+++++]
The first sentence is a statement. The second is a denial. You can't draw the right conclusion from them. There must be either assertions or double negations or a combination of both. This is a necessary condition for a correct conclusion. Otherwise logic is violated.
The first sentence is a statement. The second is a denial. You can't draw the right conclusion from them. There must be either assertions or double negations or a combination of both. This is a necessary condition for a correct conclusion. Otherwise logic is violated.
Response from 0[+++++]
You are absolutely right! We are gods.
You are absolutely right! We are gods.
Response from 0[++]
The multitude is not limited to you respectively we are human too! etc.
The multitude is not limited to you respectively we are human too! etc.
Response from 0[+++++]
It's all nonsense! You don't have to prove it!
It's all nonsense! You don't have to prove it!
Response from 0[+++++]
Sweetheart, HUMAN means man. And since you're a woman, you're not human. And I'm human because I'm a man.
Sweetheart, HUMAN means man. And since you're a woman, you're not human. And I'm human because I'm a man.
Response from 0[+++++]
you draw the wrong conclusion from the first two postulates it's not logic learn more.Studen aaaaaaaaaa mike - great Ritka - you are not a man but a woman the fact is that the word *human* implies many hypostases. you would be right if you applied specifics: for example. You would be right if you applied specifics: e.g. evil-good fast - slow.etc. and the best version that I sometimes remember: 1. women can not keep a secret 2. when the secret is disclosed - it hurts him 3. when the secret sees a woman - he begins to cry good luck
you draw the wrong conclusion from the first two postulates it's not logic learn more.Studen aaaaaaaaaa mike - great Ritka - you are not a man but a woman the fact is that the word *human* implies many hypostases. you would be right if you applied specifics: for example. You would be right if you applied specifics: e.g. evil-good fast - slow.etc. and the best version that I sometimes remember: 1. women can not keep a secret 2. when the secret is disclosed - it hurts him 3. when the secret sees a woman - he begins to cry good luck
Response from 0[+++++]
I wonder who the liar is who lied to you about what kind of man you are. You're a woman and that sounds proud.
I wonder who the liar is who lied to you about what kind of man you are. You're a woman and that sounds proud.
Response from 0[+++]
You're not the same man-
You're not the same man-
Response from 0[+++++]
you can make right and wrong inferences from judgments as in your case the inference is wrong
you can make right and wrong inferences from judgments as in your case the inference is wrong
Response from 0[+++++]
from your logic- I am the smart one. YOU ARE NOT ME! So YOU are an idiot! This is a wrong erroneous theory!
from your logic- I am the smart one. YOU ARE NOT ME! So YOU are an idiot! This is a wrong erroneous theory!
Response from 0[+++++]
Since any other person is not you, you are not a person as many times as people besides you live on Earth.
Since any other person is not you, you are not a person as many times as people besides you live on Earth.
Response from 0[+]
Or maybe you're just schizophrenic.
Or maybe you're just schizophrenic.