The author posted a question in Auto, Moto
About the Logan on all the forums, and all the reviews say well, is that such PR or really a thing? and got a better answer
Response from
In my opinion, the Renault Logan is a normal budget car. As for design, I've seen such a car pure black, with bumper in body color, with dark tinting and on cast discs with nikhki profile. As for the price range, for about 11750 you get it with air conditioner + ABS + airbag + set of winter tires. A little unhappy with the engine noise at high revs. Also the fuel consumption is not too small. I would not buy such a car. A good alternative is a 4 year old Lancer. As for VAZ and Logan, you can argue endlessly. Everyone has his own opinion on the subject. Logan has a miserable design inside outside, only tuning can save it. And what about the Kalina? Or 10? Cheapness in maintenance, compared to Logan.
in my opinion, the reno logan is a normal budget car. As for the design, I saw such a car pure black, with a bumper in the color of the body, with dark toning and on cast discs with nikhki profile. As for the price range, for about 11750 you get it with air conditioner + ABS + airbag + set of winter tires. A little unhappy with the engine noise at high revs. Also the fuel consumption is not too small. I would not buy such a car. A good alternative is a 4 year old Lancer. As for VAZ and Logan, you can argue endlessly. Everyone has his own opinion on the subject. Logan has a miserable design inside outside, only tuning can save it. And what about the Kalina? Or 10? Cheapness in service, compared to Logan.
All French cars are good when they are new, but older ones.
It is impossible to look at it without tears. Just look at the back.
is such PR, in fact the car breaks, rattles, rides badly, is ugly inside and outside and the image of a sucker
Sure PR their quality is not good and once again if you buy a new car you will be screwed all the time with the warranty
Maybe the owners are ashamed to admit it
our cab drivers use them. Inexpensive, reliable, economical.
Most likely yes. Logan is a disgusting car! Better to buy a VAZ, there will be less problems. Maintenance is much cheaper, workmanship and paint quality is better than Logan. Shitty Lohan.what do you need it for?
a Logan down south. The car is a doll, not broke even once, the speed is good, comfortable and convenient. The child slept on the back seat. The air conditioner. The 1000 km drive to the sea was unnoticeable.
Folks - it's hard for me to judge so many people, but I think. that Logan is not a decent car
Fuck yeah it's a good car don't listen to all the bullshit everyone is bullshitting in absentia without even driving the car.
it will hold out for 3 years, give it a monument and sell it fast and cheap and far away
is a poorly built, tightly stitched car. For a wretched exterior, a simple and relatively reliable car after three years of operation will crumble
Well in any case it is much better than our automobile industry! Sure the same Koreans Focus Lancer Mazda, etc. better, but they do not cost 10 grand and Logan can be a decent for 11 buys a very good complete set. You can only buy a naked ten for 10500!
Logan is a disgusting car! It is better to buy VAZ, there will be less problems. VAZ? Oce is precisely nonsense! Ride them first, and then write. In Kiev, if you take the ratio of cab drivers in Logans and VAZ = Logan 70, VAZ = 30.
I don't think so.
For its money a good car is a bit more expensive than a Russian car but it is much better in terms of build quality, safety and reliability. Concerning the expensive service - it is a lie the prices for all the service you can learn from the dealers they are more than acceptable. The exterior of Logan is to your liking, but the quality will not disappoint.