what do you think of PelevinGenerational pi’s book



The author posted a question in Arts Culture

what do you think of PelevinGenerational pi's book? and got a better answer

Response from
Not a bad book, or rather the first half. But the mushroom theme is overly hyperbolized. Considering that the book was written in 1998, one can assume that Pelevin stole the idea from Beigbeder, whose novel 99 francs was published a year earlier and, to be honest, is better written. Although, if we take into account the principle of the hovering of thoughts in the ether, maybe the creative intentions of the authors coincided in time?

Response from 0[++]
Not a bad book or rather the first half. But the mushroom theme is overly hyperbolized. Given that the book was written in 1998 can be assumed that Pelevin stole the idea from Beigbeder, whose novel99 francs was released a year earlier and, frankly, written better. Although if you take into account the principle of floating thoughts in the ether can be creative ideas of the authors coincided in time?

Response from 0[++++]
I like it.

Response from 0[+++++]
It's not a bad book. I read it a long time ago, about four years ago. It's an ordinary read. We have seen much more than that in real journalistic life

Response from 0[+++++]
Talented conjecture.

Response from 0[++++]
I haven't read it but Chepayev and emptiness Life of the Vampires The Light Book of the Shapeshifter The Golden Arrow I liked it very much yet The Numbers - they say it's a good novel

Response from 0[+++++]
I liked it, not brilliant, but well done.

Response from 0[+++++]
This story should be banned. They don't like it when they tell the truth about us, or worse, when they write about us. Only good or nothing about them. Otherwise we can get angry with them and show all sorts of rubbish from which the social conscience will pass into the unconsciousness of citizens or the subconscious of the rarefied crowd. So it's not even worth trying to show, tell and ask about it all.

Response from 0[+]
An average read. Not Dostoevsky of course. But not totally lame like Dontsova either.

Response from 0[+++++]
a very entertaining read. I even read it twice.

Response from 0[+++++]
A good novel, not Pelevin's best, but not as lame as Numbers.

Response from 0[+++++]
Wow. But The Hermit and Six-Fingered liked it better. Kinder and more optimistic I'm an incorrigible optimist. And of all the things I've read from Pelevin, the term I liked the most was roto-asshole.

Response from 1yard[+++++]
Hi! Here is a selection of topics with similar questions and answers to your question: what do you think of PelevinGenerational pi's book?
Луканин Вячеслав Георгиевич on Wikipedia
Check out the wikipedia article about Луканин Вячеслав Георгиевич
 

To answer the question:

Name*

E-mail:*

Reply text:*
Verification code (enter 22):*