How do you distinguish a philosopher from a dilettante?



The author posted a question in Philosophy, the Unseen

How do you distinguish a philosopher from a dilettante? and got a better answer

Response from

Response from 0[+++++]
A philosopher can tell a philosopher from an amateur, but an amateur cannot. If you can't, alas.

Response from 0[+++++]
dilettantes are even more philosophers now!

Response from 0[++++]
There is no difference. Both can talk all sorts of nonsense.

Response from 0[+++++]
There is no clear line. You're welcome.

Response from 0[+++++]
In order to understand this question, one must first define these two notions: the philosopher and the idilettante. After all, a philosopher is not necessarily a wise man who has answers to many questions - again, not to all, but only to many. I will not cite definitions from any source, but in my opinion, a philosopher is a person who uses his potential to get answers to questions that interest him. For all that, he may be a dilettante in a number of fields, but he does not cease to be a philosopher=

Response from 0[++]
A philosopher and a dilettante can both answer wisely. Because a dilettante can also become a philosopher. it would be impossible to tell them apart until you ask them about it.

Response from 0[+++]
real philosophers always go around

Кластер on Wikipedia
Check out the wikipedia article about Кластер
 

To answer the question:

Name*

E-mail:*

Reply text:*
Verification code (enter 22):*