The author posted a question in Family
If you go to school at age 8 instead of 7.Wouldn't it be worse, what do you think? and got a better answer
Response from Антон Владимирович[+++++]
Every child is different: someone at age 4 can already read, someone at age 7 cannot concentrate on one exercise, someone is bored with peers, and someone is not interested in real life at all - he flies in the clouds. For example, I sent my eldest son to school when he was almost 6 and a half. In his class there are children from 6.5 to 8.5 years old! And the youngest will give the school only at the age of 7.8. There is nothing wrong with sending a child to school at the age of 8. The main thing is that the child should be mature enough to learn. And we parents have to do everything to make the child mature for school!
Every child is different: someone at age 4 is already reading, someone at age 7 can't concentrate on one exercise, someone is bored with peers, and someone is not interested in real life - he flies in the clouds. For example, I sent my eldest son to school when he was almost 6 and a half. In his class there are children from 6.5 to 8.5 years old! And the youngest will give the school only at the age of 7.8. There is nothing wrong with sending a child to school at the age of 8. The main thing is that the child should be mature enough to learn. And we parents have to do everything for our child to mature for school!
Better at 7:00, that's the best.
No, it isn't!
it'll be even better.
It will. I know. 100. Don't. I went that way myself.
If you don't go at all it won't get worse either.
It is unlikely that every child has a different age for school, but if you give it to him before and he is not ready to be 6 years old, he may fall behind in his studies, but of course not everything is individual.
It will be! Your child will be 1-2 years older than the others. It is not always pleasant for the child! And why don't you want to give him up at 7? Are you afraid he won't be able to cope? Do you think he's too young?
son went to school at 8. Nothing wrong with that!
better than 7.
the child degrades and everything should be at 6 or at the latest at 7- but not at 8-
better at 7
sister gave them up at 7 and advised to give them up at 8. She says kids who go to the same grade but they are a year older and they are doing better in everything, even though they are not smarter than her daughter
IT'S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE! BECAUSE CHILDREN ARE GIVEN AT 7 AND 6! THE AGE DIFFERENCE WILL INTERFERE! AND IF THE CHILD IS A BOY, HE WILL BE DRAFTED INTO THE ARMY AFTER 11TH GRADE!
Well it's supposed to be at 6 but if phtmtyjr isn't developed and ready enough then it's better at 7. Well at 8 it's too late.
I'm not an expert on the subject. But it will not turn out that the boy immediately after school will be taken in the army and he will not have time to go to college If we are talking about a boy. And so you need to look at the child who in incomplete 7 can be given and who only at 8.
It won't be worse in principle. However, you need to keep in mind that all this is individual and 1. the most active years of learning is childhood and if the child is ready for school according to experts, then it's time to give it to him, to make it easier to study, in a year he will change interests development 2. then it turns out that he will graduate from school as an adult person of age, if a boy, he will not even have a chance to enter - in the army with a spring call will get
It's OK, I went to school when I was 10. They didn't take me to school for a long time, I couldn't read or count. But I smoked and swore.
We gave mine away when I was six and we're still in third grade
Boys only at 7 and no later. They have the army ahead of them. Girls can start at 8. There's no rush.