The author posted a question in Society, Politics, Media
If it's hard to sink an aircraft carrier, maybe it's easier to burn it then? and got a better answer
Response from Mario fribus[+++++]
I highly doubt it's that hard to sink?
Response from 0[+++++]
I highly doubt it's that hard to sink.
I highly doubt it's that hard to sink.
Response from 0[+++++]
about the environment?
about the environment?
Response from 0[+++++]
It'll sink on its own, we'll just have to charge it with something more powerful, but it'll spill fuel and lubricants, Flippers will suffer.
It'll sink on its own, we'll just have to charge it with something more powerful, but it'll spill fuel and lubricants, Flippers will suffer.
Response from 0[+++++]
It's easy now. It used to be hard.
It's easy now. It used to be hard.
Response from 0[+++++]
It's not that hard to sink, really. One dagger and that's it.
It's not that hard to sink, really. One dagger and that's it.
Response from 0[+++++]
You don't have to sink it, just ruin the flight deck, and it's completely harmless.
You don't have to sink it, just ruin the flight deck, and it's completely harmless.
Response from 0[+++++]
It's better to drill holes with a drill, like on the ISS.
It's better to drill holes with a drill, like on the ISS.
Response from 0[+++++]
It's easier not to build it.
It's easier not to build it.
Response from 0[+++++]
You have no aircraft carriers. There was one, but Kuchma drank it away.
You have no aircraft carriers. There was one, but Kuchma drank it away.