The author posted a question in Society, Politics, Media
Death penalty - for or against? and got a better answer
Response from
Pro. But to the extent that it's spelled out in the CC. Just remove the moratorium. And in general, the aggravation of punishment is no guarantee that there will be less crime. But the inevitability of punishment - yes! First and foremost, we must improve the efficiency of law enforcement. If the villain knows that he will be caught anyway, he will think 50 times before committing something. Another advantage - it is better to immediately execute a desperate scoundrel, than to keep him for life at the expense of taxpayers, among whom, by the way, there are people who have suffered from his actions. PS Or better yet - bring back the Gulag! Let them build roads, otherwise it is impossible to drive:
Response from 0[+++++]
In favor. But to the extent that it is prescribed in the CC. Just remove the moratorium. In general, making the punishment heavier is not a guarantee that there will be less crime. But the inevitability of punishment - yes! First and foremost, we must improve the efficiency of law enforcement. If the villain knows that he will still be caught, he will think 50 times before committing something. Another advantage - it is better to immediately execute a desperate scoundrel, than to keep him for life at the expense of taxpayers, among whom, by the way, there are people who have suffered from his actions. PS Or better yet - bring back the Gulag! Let them build roads, otherwise it is impossible to drive:
In favor. But to the extent that it is prescribed in the CC. Just remove the moratorium. In general, making the punishment heavier is not a guarantee that there will be less crime. But the inevitability of punishment - yes! First and foremost, we must improve the efficiency of law enforcement. If the villain knows that he will still be caught, he will think 50 times before committing something. Another advantage - it is better to immediately execute a desperate scoundrel, than to keep him for life at the expense of taxpayers, among whom, by the way, there are people who have suffered from his actions. PS Or better yet - bring back the Gulag! Let them build roads, otherwise it is impossible to drive:
Response from 0[+++++]
Flog them bastards! All of them! I am for it!
Flog them bastards! All of them! I am for it!
Response from 0[+++]
Yes!
Yes!
Response from 0[+++++]
Against. Although the Constitution stipulates it as a punishment.
Against. Although the Constitution stipulates it as a punishment.
Response from 0[+++++]
Only FOR
Only FOR
Response from 0[++]
they release or give a year in prison for murder!
they release or give a year in prison for murder!
Response from 0[+++++]
rapists, repeat murderers, and psychos with both hands only FOR
rapists, repeat murderers, and psychos with both hands only FOR
Response from 0[++++]
against in our country!
against in our country!
Response from 0[+++++]
In the voice of Lenin
In the voice of Lenin
Response from 0[+++++]
against.
against.
Response from 0[+++++]
I believe it is better to have the death penalty than life imprisonment. Better to die at once than to sit in prison all your life.
I believe it is better to have the death penalty than life imprisonment. Better to die at once than to sit in prison all your life.
Response from 0[+++++]
Pros!
Pros!
Response from 0[+++++]
Some of my staff can.
Some of my staff can.
Response from 0[++]
Actually, the question is very complicated. And there is a double-edged sword here. For example, I do not understand how you can so quickly and calmly answer FOR! What right do you have to judge and take people's lives. We do not give life, nor do we take it away. But then another problem arises If this man has ruined more than one human life, how can it go unpunished.
Actually, the question is very complicated. And there is a double-edged sword here. For example, I do not understand how you can so quickly and calmly answer FOR! What right do you have to judge and take people's lives. We do not give life, nor do we take it away. But then another problem arises If this man has ruined more than one human life, how can it go unpunished.
Response from 0[+]
I'm in! No need to feed them all their lives!
I'm in! No need to feed them all their lives!
Response from 0[+++++]
I'm FOR it if our justice will look for the perpetrators and not those who take the blame so they don't get beaten up
I'm FOR it if our justice will look for the perpetrators and not those who take the blame so they don't get beaten up
Response from 0[+++++]
Maniacs, repeat offenders, pedophiles, terrorists, etc. should be put in a special polyclinic to be experimented on. At least they would be of some use to mankind. Let scientists test drugs, household chemicals and cosmetics on them. Instead of torturing innocent animals, let them dissect criminals.
Maniacs, repeat offenders, pedophiles, terrorists, etc. should be put in a special polyclinic to be experimented on. At least they would be of some use to mankind. Let scientists test drugs, household chemicals and cosmetics on them. Instead of torturing innocent animals, let them dissect criminals.
Response from 0[+++++]
Here it is customary to say that society has no right to take life, and they say those who, thank God, have passed over. They teach all-powerfulness to those who have not passed over and who cannot accept that their children, mothers and loved ones are dead and the scum remained alive, and is also kept on his money and will be granted amnesty. As for the perpetrator, I would not hesitate to shoot a rapist and so on like a rabid dog. And I would not feel guilty.
Here it is customary to say that society has no right to take life, and they say those who, thank God, have passed over. They teach all-powerfulness to those who have not passed over and who cannot accept that their children, mothers and loved ones are dead and the scum remained alive, and is also kept on his money and will be granted amnesty. As for the perpetrator, I would not hesitate to shoot a rapist and so on like a rabid dog. And I would not feel guilty.
Response from 0[+++++]
Increased penalties have never resulted in less crime, but they have increased the number and severity of that crime.Plus, are you sure that with our justice system, the wrongful death penalty won't affect you and your loved ones?
Increased penalties have never resulted in less crime, but they have increased the number and severity of that crime.Plus, are you sure that with our justice system, the wrongful death penalty won't affect you and your loved ones?
Response from 0[+++++]
Of course I'm against it. 1 The death penalty is society's attempt to absolve itself of its responsibilities for this particular criminal, no criminal, no problem; 2 History knows mistakes. Would you agree to be the victim of a mistake, like Kravchenko, who was shot instead of Chikatilo? 3 Life imprisonment is a much harsher punishment than execution. And there is always the possibility of correcting mistakes; 4 And lastly, the executor of the sentence is in principle the same murderer as the convict. The only difference is that one has a job and the other a mania; The whole argument boils down to the question, does society have the right to take another person's life?
Of course I'm against it. 1 The death penalty is society's attempt to absolve itself of its responsibilities for this particular criminal, no criminal, no problem; 2 History knows mistakes. Would you agree to be the victim of a mistake, like Kravchenko, who was shot instead of Chikatilo? 3 Life imprisonment is a much harsher punishment than execution. And there is always the possibility of correcting mistakes; 4 And lastly, the executor of the sentence is in principle the same murderer as the convict. The only difference is that one has a job and the other a mania; The whole argument boils down to the question, does society have the right to take another person's life?
Response from 1yard[+++++]
Hi! Here is a selection of topics with similar questions and answers to your question: Death penalty - for or against?