Who thinks that pure fighting for leadership in a group is betrayal?



The author posted a question in Society, Politics, Media

Who thinks that pure fighting for leadership in a group is betrayal? and got a better answer

Response from Worobioff[+++++]
If it's a pure struggle, it's not betrayal.

Response from 0[+++++]
If it's a pure struggle, it's not betrayal.

Response from 0[+++++]
It's a struggle for existence.

Response from 0[+++++]
It depends.

Response from 0[+++++]
Nonsense at the very least.

Response from 0[+++++]
In most cases. Especially in a work collective! Everyone is like colleagues, but behind their backs they do all sorts of nasty things, snitching on each other! Or rivalry between children in the family. But if it's, for example, some kind of game - then it's the opposite.

Response from 0[+]
if you're a leader then keep it that way, if your friend tells you that you're a traitor, it's only out of envy.

Response from 0[+++++]
Walking on your head, sometimes necessary.

Response from 0[+++++]
It's not betrayal, unless techniques like meanness, etc., are used.

Response from 0[+++++]
Is fighting clean? When you fight, you are bound to hurt someone. It seems to me that the place of leadership should naturally belong to the most worthy. Be worthy and you won't have to fight and shove others.

Response from 0[++]
Я. You youngsters have lost your sense of elbow like you never had one. But you have a very developed sense of the knee.

Response from 0[+++++]
This is utter nonsense! I've never heard that! The pure competition for group leadership is what makes the group evolve, what keeps it together. If there is no competition - there will be no development and everything will fall apart and rot away instantly!

 

To answer the question:

Name*

E-mail:*

Reply text:*
Verification code (enter 22):*