Reread a lot of reviews this morning. The arguments around DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, but I still don’t understand which is better



The author posted a question in Photography, Videography

Reread a lot of reviews this morning. The arguments around DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, but I still don't understand which is better? and got a better answer

Response from Антон Владимирович[+++++]

Response from 0[+++++]
Unfortunately, many people nowadays don't realize that you can take good pictures with a soapbox.

Response from 0[+++++]
these arguments like: who's prettier, blondes or brunettes? Take whichever one you like in the store, they look a little different in the pictures on the internet

Response from 0[+++++]
Which is better? This is a rhetorical question = THE BEST THING that suits you best, not the salesperson in the store = You can't say that a spoon is better than a fork or chopsticks. If something was worse, people would not buy it. And about the artificial image. It's not true, even pro often can not tell the difference between the picture from the DSLR and BZ. That's the way it is=

Response from 0[+++++]
Start with the Canon Mark iii

Response from 0[+++++]
Well, if you have a desire to grow, buy new lenses, flashes, shoot in the studio etc. etc. in the future, then mirrorless is not even worth considering in that case. You can take great photos with a mirrorless camera, but for studio work with several flashes they are much worse, and such top lenses at the moment, which are available for SLR cameras, I think it will be extremely difficult to find

Response from 0[+++++]
A little bit of experience taking pictures with different cameras for landscapes, - whatever, in bright sunlight almost identical result, the only thing on the screen in the sun - nothing is visible, so what was photographed will be a surprise. for example on the tour - similarly to a party - here it is difficult to keep up with a mirror, or a lot of misses on the screen or normal shooting with a mirror, I want to try studio photography - the same thing, a lot of work with a mirrorless camera, which is blind in the pilot light, And to focus you have to turn on the light in the studio which you don't need to shoot, it means you have to have an assistant on the switch, you focus, half-press the button and on your command he turns the light off, and you shoot and then he turns the light on again. Pilot light is not enough, I checked.

Response from 0[+++++]
What does the lurk say about trolls?

Response from 0[+++++]
The picture from my mirrorless camera is only distinguished by the 3:4 aspect ratio, not 2:3 as usual

Response from 0[+++++]
canon 5dmk3 24-70mm2.8mk2

Response from 0[+]
if you only look at these options, then I answer that I'm for sralkalka although I have ite and other pictures That's why I think it makes sense in the future to take a SLR flash lens but for a system mirrorless take lenses I think they are not worth it A about the quality of photos and those ite shoot well

Response from 0[+++++]
It doesn't matter if it's a DSLR or mirrorless. It's the size of the sensor that matters. And a good lens. For $5,000 you can buy a very good DSLR with multiple lenses.

 

To answer the question:

Name*

E-mail:*

Reply text:*
Verification code (enter 22):*