The author posted a question in Animals, Plants
Are beavers a threat to the environment? and got a better answer
Response from
Beavers are animals that significantly alter the ecosystem. Their building, loading activity alters riparian forests, riverbeds, temperature regimes, and leads to siltation and littering of water bodies. As a result, the species composition of both aquatic and coastal animals and plants changes. In the mid-20th century, they were thoughtlessly released anywhere, and now they have settled down and fouled the rivers all over Siberia. They were settled for hunting, and now nobody needs beavers' skins for fuck's sake. In the 1980s the price of a beaver was 200 rubles, and a sable 120 rubles. Nowadays the price of a beaver is 400-500 rubles, and a sable 2-3 thousand rubles. Conclusion: beavers can live in the rivers, but there shouldn't be many of them?
Beavers are animals that significantly alter the ecosystem. Their construction activities lead to changes in the riparian forests of the river channel temperature regime leads to siltation and littering of the reservoir. As a result, the species composition of both aquatic and coastal animals and plants changes. In the mid-20th century, they were thoughtlessly released anywhere, and now they have settled in and fouled the rivers all over Siberia. They resettled them for hunting, but now nobody needs beavers' skins. In the 1980s, a beaver cost 200 sable 120 rubles; now the price of a beaver is 400-500 rubles for a sable of 2-3 thousand rubles. Conclusion: beavers can live in the rivers but they should not be too many.
no they must be saved!
no the threat is HUMAN
rather a rescue they only live in a clean environment.
Of course you eat the beaver, save the tree!
no they build dams and help the environment in some way but it's a pity they get killed-
beavers can't be a threat to the environment just because they are a part of it and everything is fine without human interference
man is a threat to the environment!
Aha, and a pink groundhog is a threat to mental health.
The beaver is an animal created by nature for nature itself. For ecology it is much more terrible not beaver but industrial wastes of cities growing like cancerous tumors on the planet. There are not even theoretical works. Where is the limit of urban sprawl and to what limits?
Bybers is a benefit to humans is a detriment!
no
If there were no beavers then there were plenty of trees Nature has no bad animals all are interconnected Plant-PREADER-Parasite
So I understand the humorist: Well, as comrade Fomenko said: Eat a beaver - save the tree!: Actually, what the Creator created is not correct to call a threat at least. And especially if they do not have their own will and intellect to do it themselves NOT the way it was intended. So, ecology is threatened ONLY by HUMAN and no one else: When people settle down, then ecology will be better: And what do beavers have to do with it?
No, of course not.