The author posted a question in Legal Advice
Borrowed money? and got a better answer
Response from
The formulation of the question gives the creditor confidence in the timely repayment of the loan by the debtor?
Response from 0[+++++]
The way the question is posed gives the creditor confidence that the debtor will pay back the loan on time
The way the question is posed gives the creditor confidence that the debtor will pay back the loan on time
Response from 0[+++++]
If you don't pay it back, yes!
If you don't pay it back, yes!
Response from 0[+++++]
any handwritten receipt is evidence in court
any handwritten receipt is evidence in court
Response from 0[+++++]
If you have no intention of paying it back, you may be sued
If you have no intention of paying it back, you may be sued
Response from 0[+++++]
prefer not to borrow, but if I do, I always give it back. And then what were you thinking about when you borrowed it?
prefer not to borrow, but if I do, I always give it back. And then what were you thinking about when you borrowed it?
Response from 0[+++++]
the situation is not very clear: who borrowed from whom. But the presence of a receipt is already a plus in a court case: it will be possible to conduct forensic handwriting examination and establish the perpetrator in the event that the person who took the money and who wrote this receipt refuses to the fact that he took the money
the situation is not very clear: who borrowed from whom. But the presence of a receipt is already a plus in a court case: it will be possible to conduct forensic handwriting examination and establish the perpetrator in the event that the person who took the money and who wrote this receipt refuses to the fact that he took the money
Response from 0[+++++]
And who took money from whom?
And who took money from whom?
Response from 0[++++]
It all depends on the content of the receipt, but as a general rule established by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, a receipt is equivalent to a loan agreement.
It all depends on the content of the receipt, but as a general rule established by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, a receipt is equivalent to a loan agreement.
Response from 0[+++++]
A receipt does not need to be legally formalized. It is 100 proof of the fact of the loan for the court. The phraseBorrowed money means that you borrowed money. But what you seem to mean is that you are the creditor. That is, you lent money to someone. The court will collect the debt on the receipt, don't doubt it.
A receipt does not need to be legally formalized. It is 100 proof of the fact of the loan for the court. The phraseBorrowed money means that you borrowed money. But what you seem to mean is that you are the creditor. That is, you lent money to someone. The court will collect the debt on the receipt, don't doubt it.