The author posted a question in Legal Advice
Did the judge act legally? and got a better answer
Response from
The actions of the judge court are not based on the law, because in order to determine whether the living space meets sanitary standards a court expertise must be appointed, due to the fact that only an expert is the legal person to determine whether the living space meets sanitary standards, but not the judge. And whether the living space meets the standard required for a child's living can be established by the court only on the basis of the technical passport of the apartment.
Response from 0[+++++]
The judge's actions are not based on the law, because in order to determine whether a dwelling complies with sanitary norms a court expertise must be appointed, due to the fact that only an expert is entitled to determine whether a dwelling complies with sanitary norms, but not a judge. The court may determine whether the living area is adequate for a child only on the basis of the technical passport of the apartment.
The judge's actions are not based on the law, because in order to determine whether a dwelling complies with sanitary norms a court expertise must be appointed, due to the fact that only an expert is entitled to determine whether a dwelling complies with sanitary norms, but not a judge. The court may determine whether the living area is adequate for a child only on the basis of the technical passport of the apartment.
Response from 0[+++++]
yes
yes
Response from 0[+++++]
no - that would be within the competence of the child welfare authorities
no - that would be within the competence of the child welfare authorities
Response from 0[+++++]
Are you out of your mind? Every other idiot is going to evaluate the court's actions. If the court deems it necessary to hold a bench trial, then it will hold a bench trial. And don't you dare yap about legality. The actions of the court, by definition, are legitimate.
Are you out of your mind? Every other idiot is going to evaluate the court's actions. If the court deems it necessary to hold a bench trial, then it will hold a bench trial. And don't you dare yap about legality. The actions of the court, by definition, are legitimate.
Response from 0[+++++]
to Article 184 of the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation the written and material evidence, which is impossible or difficult to bring to the court, is examined and examined at their location or in another place determined by the court. Given that it is impossible to bring the apartment to court, it is legitimate. Did they tie the defendant to the chair? By depriving him of the opportunity to defend himself.
to Article 184 of the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation the written and material evidence, which is impossible or difficult to bring to the court, is examined and examined at their location or in another place determined by the court. Given that it is impossible to bring the apartment to court, it is legitimate. Did they tie the defendant to the chair? By depriving him of the opportunity to defend himself.