The author posted a question in Legal Advice
What can be used to argue the expert's conclusion? and got a better answer
Response from
the expert and the expert that his opinion, even if wrong - THIS is the opinion of the expert and after the examination, the court may give the work to another expert, but still the opinion of the expert is uncontested, unless. but it is almost impossible?
Response from 0[+++++]
the expert and the expert that his opinion even if incorrect - THIS IS THE EXPERT'S Opinion and after the expertise only the court can give the work for examination to other expert but nevertheless the expert opinion is uncontested unless. but it is almost impossible
the expert and the expert that his opinion even if incorrect - THIS IS THE EXPERT'S Opinion and after the expertise only the court can give the work for examination to other expert but nevertheless the expert opinion is uncontested unless. but it is almost impossible
Response from 0[+++++]
To the expert by the neck
To the expert by the neck
Response from 0[+++++]
Opinion of what?
Opinion of what?
Response from 0[+++++]
Which one? And what is the conclusion about?
Which one? And what is the conclusion about?
Response from 0[+++++]
Conducting a re-examination.
Conducting a re-examination.
Response from 0[+++++]
Only for another expert's opinion.
Only for another expert's opinion.
Response from 0[++]
Depending on what factors are there.You can press for incompetence.
Depending on what factors are there.You can press for incompetence.
Response from 0[+++++]
insufficient experience, seniority, improper methodology. improper phrasing of questions. If on criminal, failure to provide you with the protocol on appointment of carrying out of examination before its carrying out, it is the most widespread mistake, it is always provided already simultaneously with the conclusion of the expert examination, and the CPC demands obligatory provision before carrying out of examination, Article 198. Rights of a suspect, accused, victim, witness during assignment and forensic examination 1. During the appointment and performance of the forensic examination, the suspect, the accused, his defense counsel shall have the right to: 1 to get acquainted with the resolution ordering the forensic examination; 2 to challenge the expert or to request that the forensic examination be carried out in another expert institution; 3 to request that persons specified by them be engaged as experts or that the forensic examination be carried out in a particular expert institution; 4 to request that additional questions be included in the resolution ordering the forensic examination; 5 to attend the forensic examination, with permission of the investigator; to give explanations to the expert; 6 sign -- The second part of Article 198 shall be applied according to the constitutional and legal sense found in the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 04.11.2004 N 430-O. -- A witness and a victim, in respect of whom a forensic examination was carried out, have the right to become acquainted with the expert's conclusion. The victim shall also enjoy the rights provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Part One of this Article.
insufficient experience, seniority, improper methodology. improper phrasing of questions. If on criminal, failure to provide you with the protocol on appointment of carrying out of examination before its carrying out, it is the most widespread mistake, it is always provided already simultaneously with the conclusion of the expert examination, and the CPC demands obligatory provision before carrying out of examination, Article 198. Rights of a suspect, accused, victim, witness during assignment and forensic examination 1. During the appointment and performance of the forensic examination, the suspect, the accused, his defense counsel shall have the right to: 1 to get acquainted with the resolution ordering the forensic examination; 2 to challenge the expert or to request that the forensic examination be carried out in another expert institution; 3 to request that persons specified by them be engaged as experts or that the forensic examination be carried out in a particular expert institution; 4 to request that additional questions be included in the resolution ordering the forensic examination; 5 to attend the forensic examination, with permission of the investigator; to give explanations to the expert; 6 sign -- The second part of Article 198 shall be applied according to the constitutional and legal sense found in the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 04.11.2004 N 430-O. -- A witness and a victim, in respect of whom a forensic examination was carried out, have the right to become acquainted with the expert's conclusion. The victim shall also enjoy the rights provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Part One of this Article.
Response from 0[+++++]
Request a re-examination by another expert. And based on the results, see if there is a chance to challenge or not.
Request a re-examination by another expert. And based on the results, see if there is a chance to challenge or not.