The author posted a question in Science, Technology, Languages
Why is Russian compared to Sanskrit and not modern Hindi? and got a better answer
Response from Антон Владимирович[+++++]
Because Old Russian and Sanskrit are essentially the same language.Sanskrit means: the meaning itself is hidden?
Response from 0[+++++]
Because Old Russian and Sanskrit are essentially the same language.Sanskrit means: the meaning itself is hidden.
Because Old Russian and Sanskrit are essentially the same language.Sanskrit means: the meaning itself is hidden.
Response from 0[+++++]
Because those morons who compare Hindi don't even know about the existence of Hindi.
Because those morons who compare Hindi don't even know about the existence of Hindi.
Response from 0[+++++]
You want to look for the roots somewhere in the depths. Times. And of course there are a few dozen notable analogies. But enthusiasts take it to the point of complete absurdity >>>Here come the examples!
You want to look for the roots somewhere in the depths. Times. And of course there are a few dozen notable analogies. But enthusiasts take it to the point of complete absurdity >>>Here come the examples!
Response from 0[+++++]
Ignoramuses. Don't know that Lithuanian is much closer to Sanskrit than Russian. And so want mystery and romance.
Ignoramuses. Don't know that Lithuanian is much closer to Sanskrit than Russian. And so want mystery and romance.
Response from 0[+++++]
It makes sense to compare a child to his parents, not to his younger brothers. Since Sanskrit, brain volume has decreased quite sensitively, especially in regions with warm winters. Accordingly, languages have become simpler. Some more, others less. In addition to releasing the emotional ancient complexities of numerous verb tenses, mooing, . there has been a saturation of languages with technological terms. And also some less, others more For example, the chimpanzee is the brother of man. But it is much more useful for science to compare humans not with chimpanzees, but with their common ancestor, who was probably slightly smarter than chimpanzees
It makes sense to compare a child to his parents, not to his younger brothers. Since Sanskrit, brain volume has decreased quite sensitively, especially in regions with warm winters. Accordingly, languages have become simpler. Some more, others less. In addition to releasing the emotional ancient complexities of numerous verb tenses, mooing, . there has been a saturation of languages with technological terms. And also some less, others more For example, the chimpanzee is the brother of man. But it is much more useful for science to compare humans not with chimpanzees, but with their common ancestor, who was probably slightly smarter than chimpanzees
Response from 0[+++++]
Sanskrit, you see, is more complex: grammatically. Plus it's the language of ancient wisdom well, sort of. Hence the comparison to it is kind of more solid. Hindi, on the other hand, doesn't have any particularly striking features and attracts less attention.
Sanskrit, you see, is more complex: grammatically. Plus it's the language of ancient wisdom well, sort of. Hence the comparison to it is kind of more solid. Hindi, on the other hand, doesn't have any particularly striking features and attracts less attention.
Response from 0[+++++]
They want to surpass the Ancient Uks.
They want to surpass the Ancient Uks.