The author posted a question in Legal Advice
How do you take your son away from his mom of 6 years? and got a better answer
Response from
Response from 0[+++++]
Maybe the kid can decide for himself who he wants to live with. Six years is a long time. And if the kid really wants to, he'll decide for himself.
Maybe the kid can decide for himself who he wants to live with. Six years is a long time. And if the kid really wants to, he'll decide for himself.
Response from 0[+++++]
He should be with his mom by 12. They share the same energy, they're connected by vibrations. You should visit and socialize since you didn't keep the family together.
He should be with his mom by 12. They share the same energy, they're connected by vibrations. You should visit and socialize since you didn't keep the family together.
Response from 0[++++]
There's no way! In the RF it is built so that in any case the child stays with the mother. It is very difficult to take a child away. Perhaps only if the mother is a drug addict or alcoholic, and it is a long time to prove, and perhaps the court will not be in your favor, but will give the mother a chance.
There's no way! In the RF it is built so that in any case the child stays with the mother. It is very difficult to take a child away. Perhaps only if the mother is a drug addict or alcoholic, and it is a long time to prove, and perhaps the court will not be in your favor, but will give the mother a chance.
Response from 0[+++++]
6 years: the son of a mother the duration of the taking away?
6 years: the son of a mother the duration of the taking away?
Response from 0[+++++]
The child should want to, because the court will question when the mother files a statement about the seizure from you, and the child should give a very good reason for the court to take into account the interests of the child and not that the father bought toys and ice cream every day about the material side of the issue in general should not be a question. Naturally, it is desirable that the mother is not very well characterized and treated the child badly, this will have to confirm the employees of the department of care and custody. And take away very simple - took by the hand and led to his own let the mother of the instances to run and prove their case.
The child should want to, because the court will question when the mother files a statement about the seizure from you, and the child should give a very good reason for the court to take into account the interests of the child and not that the father bought toys and ice cream every day about the material side of the issue in general should not be a question. Naturally, it is desirable that the mother is not very well characterized and treated the child badly, this will have to confirm the employees of the department of care and custody. And take away very simple - took by the hand and led to his own let the mother of the instances to run and prove their case.
Response from 0[+++++]
Okay, I'll try not to make fun of underage mothers. Anyway. For an answer, you need to articulate in more detail, who can you, grandmother? then do not take away; what is the problem of the child does not give the mother at all? or you are not satisfied with the time determined by the court to communicate with the baby?, what grounds for the removal of the child, etc. Yes, for ROSTEK-Orsk: the court MUST ask the child who he would like to live with after the parents divorce, only from 10 years old and from 6 only can, and most likely will not call him to court, and he does not base his decision on the child's answer, but can only take into account his wishes.
Okay, I'll try not to make fun of underage mothers. Anyway. For an answer, you need to articulate in more detail, who can you, grandmother? then do not take away; what is the problem of the child does not give the mother at all? or you are not satisfied with the time determined by the court to communicate with the baby?, what grounds for the removal of the child, etc. Yes, for ROSTEK-Orsk: the court MUST ask the child who he would like to live with after the parents divorce, only from 10 years old and from 6 only can, and most likely will not call him to court, and he does not base his decision on the child's answer, but can only take into account his wishes.
Response from 0[+++++]
The child can live with either parent in the absence of a complete family. This issue you can resolve in court order positively only if the child welfare authorities take your side and draw up a corresponding act for the court from which it will follow that living of a minor child at this time is more appropriate with his father This is a fundamental document for the decision of the court, but not the only one.
The child can live with either parent in the absence of a complete family. This issue you can resolve in court order positively only if the child welfare authorities take your side and draw up a corresponding act for the court from which it will follow that living of a minor child at this time is more appropriate with his father This is a fundamental document for the decision of the court, but not the only one.