The author posted a question in Photography, Videography
What do you say about the level of my photos? Critique please, first time doing a girl photo set! Don't forget about the processing? and got a better answer
Response from Антон Владимирович[+++++]
if you do not evaluate the work of the model, all photos have rams with the composition, legs are cut off only in the center of the thigh, but not otherwise, when sitting position just below the knee, but in no case in the middle of the ankle. the same applies to the waist. ie you would frame to pull up. no style, but instead a wild stale treatment. so - how to fix 1. look for photos of famous photographers who work in a similar style to the one you are striving for and analyze how they frame the image, how the composition is built. 2. If you still do not feel the saturation of processing, then do it necessarily as a second layer and change the transparency to 50-30, it allows you not to overdo with processing 3. be sure to mark for yourself what you strive for, then you will come to this several times faster. creative development
Response from 0[+++++]
if you do not evaluate the work of the model, then all the photos have the composition rumps, legs are cut only in the center of the hip, but in no other way, when sitting just below the knee, but in no case in the middle of the ankle. the same applies to the waist, that is, you should frame it up. no style, but instead of it wild rotted processing. so - how to fix: 1. look for photos of famous photographers who work in a similar style to the one you are striving for and analyze how they frame the image, how the composition is built. 2. If you can not feel the intensity of the processing, then do it necessarily as a second layer and change the transparency to 50-30, this allows you not to overdo the processing 3. be sure to designate for yourself what you strive for, then come to this several times faster. creative development
if you do not evaluate the work of the model, then all the photos have the composition rumps, legs are cut only in the center of the hip, but in no other way, when sitting just below the knee, but in no case in the middle of the ankle. the same applies to the waist, that is, you should frame it up. no style, but instead of it wild rotted processing. so - how to fix: 1. look for photos of famous photographers who work in a similar style to the one you are striving for and analyze how they frame the image, how the composition is built. 2. If you can not feel the intensity of the processing, then do it necessarily as a second layer and change the transparency to 50-30, this allows you not to overdo the processing 3. be sure to designate for yourself what you strive for, then come to this several times faster. creative development
Response from 0[+++++]
Not super but great for the first time!
Not super but great for the first time!
Response from 0[+]
Second from the top is good, the rest is not so good
Second from the top is good, the rest is not so good
Response from 0[+++++]
well if it's really the first time, great! Way to go.
well if it's really the first time, great! Way to go.
Response from 0[+++++]
I think the processing makes the girl's face look old.
I think the processing makes the girl's face look old.
Response from 0[+++++]
The answer, to put it mildly, the amateur is accepted? Not even - the viewer. I will not say anything about the artistic value, because. Well, never mind: But as a viewer, I liked your work. And the girl is wonderful. I especially liked the second picture. Look at the look in her eyes! What eyes! And that sly smile! And the penultimate photo, the one with only eyes in flowers? Wonderful! I think - great!
The answer, to put it mildly, the amateur is accepted? Not even - the viewer. I will not say anything about the artistic value, because. Well, never mind: But as a viewer, I liked your work. And the girl is wonderful. I especially liked the second picture. Look at the look in her eyes! What eyes! And that sly smile! And the penultimate photo, the one with only eyes in flowers? Wonderful! I think - great!
Response from 0[+++++]
good! Last but one is like in a trench.
good! Last but one is like in a trench.
Response from 0[+++++]
it's for tanks and airplanes.
it's for tanks and airplanes.
Response from 0[+++++]
The penultimate is not bad Shadows on the face in Photoshop to remove in the rest In general, well done.
The penultimate is not bad Shadows on the face in Photoshop to remove in the rest In general, well done.
Response from 0[+++++]
The girl is too clumsy and poses unnaturally. As for the composition - I liked everything. The air is there and nothing unnecessary. But about the processing - I don't agree! Or the natural colors or black! But for the first time - good for you!
The girl is too clumsy and poses unnaturally. As for the composition - I liked everything. The air is there and nothing unnecessary. But about the processing - I don't agree! Or the natural colors or black! But for the first time - good for you!
Response from 0[+++++]
1. The aperture is bigger. Careful with the elbow. The flowers are knocked out. 2.The best photo of all. Piece of birch and hand position left to the conscience of the photographer. 3. Freud would have been pleased. The aperture is wider. The birch in the butt adds another 200 Freudians. 4. What's wrong with her face? Arm-foot disproportion. Diaphragm, eh! 5. The tree takes up more than half of the frame - what's the idea? The expression on her face is strange. 6. Nice, the vignetting is spot on. 7. Very cheeky elbow. The flowers are knocked out. The model has early wrinkles, she looks about 35 years old. Open the aperture wider, and then to hide this unfortunate fact - draw it softer. Anyway, I'm mad again.
1. The aperture is bigger. Careful with the elbow. The flowers are knocked out. 2.The best photo of all. Piece of birch and hand position left to the conscience of the photographer. 3. Freud would have been pleased. The aperture is wider. The birch in the butt adds another 200 Freudians. 4. What's wrong with her face? Arm-foot disproportion. Diaphragm, eh! 5. The tree takes up more than half of the frame - what's the idea? The expression on her face is strange. 6. Nice, the vignetting is spot on. 7. Very cheeky elbow. The flowers are knocked out. The model has early wrinkles, she looks about 35 years old. Open the aperture wider, and then to hide this unfortunate fact - draw it softer. Anyway, I'm mad again.
Response from 0[+++++]
Seryoga! Will you invite me to your wedding?
Seryoga! Will you invite me to your wedding?
Response from 0[+++++]
The 2nd is the nicest, the 1st is more or less, but both have the wrong limbs cut, which is a gross mistake. Also on the first one there is a pronounced disproportion of the body, most likely due to the wrong shooting point and the chosen focal length. On the other cards it is impossible to see anything - the view is distracted by a completely predatory smile of the girl, don't shoot her with her mouth open, her teeth look very ugly.
The 2nd is the nicest, the 1st is more or less, but both have the wrong limbs cut, which is a gross mistake. Also on the first one there is a pronounced disproportion of the body, most likely due to the wrong shooting point and the chosen focal length. On the other cards it is impossible to see anything - the view is distracted by a completely predatory smile of the girl, don't shoot her with her mouth open, her teeth look very ugly.
Response from 0[+++++]
As a photography practice, these shots are commendable. Purely technically. Any artist always starts by copying the classics. But artistically, they have no value. They are just stamps.
As a photography practice, these shots are commendable. Purely technically. Any artist always starts by copying the classics. But artistically, they have no value. They are just stamps.
Response from 0[+++++]
The 1st picture is no good: the girl has the lower parts of both legs pulled off. The 2nd picture is out of place: the girl has both arms pulled off! And in general, it seems to me that not everything is okay with the BB.
The 1st picture is no good: the girl has the lower parts of both legs pulled off. The 2nd picture is out of place: the girl has both arms pulled off! And in general, it seems to me that not everything is okay with the BB.
Response from 0[+++++]
yuck. Seryoga, tell me why the fuck you always repeat the question twice: in the XDR?
yuck. Seryoga, tell me why the fuck you always repeat the question twice: in the XDR?
Response from 0[+++++]
wrinkles, I think.
wrinkles, I think.
Response from 0[+++++]
IMHO the most annoying thing is the poses the young lady is sitting in. They're all uncomfortable for her, artificial. The same goes for the facial expression, the smile: it's strained. Should have said to the young lady: Masha Glasha, sit down, as you like, look at me, think about something - but do not pose. That would make a lively image, IMHO.
IMHO the most annoying thing is the poses the young lady is sitting in. They're all uncomfortable for her, artificial. The same goes for the facial expression, the smile: it's strained. Should have said to the young lady: Masha Glasha, sit down, as you like, look at me, think about something - but do not pose. That would make a lively image, IMHO.
Response from 0[+++++]
It's okay. You'll get the hang of it. And my advice, start with a change of model.
It's okay. You'll get the hang of it. And my advice, start with a change of model.