The author posted a question in Legal Advice
Give advice? and got a better answer
Response from
Response from 0[+++++]
No, we don't have to.
No, we don't have to.
Response from 0[+++++]
Now everyone is required to do so. And a sole proprietorship and a sole proprietorship are one and the same:
Now everyone is required to do so. And a sole proprietorship and a sole proprietorship are one and the same:
Response from 0[+]
Mandatory. Once my boss at my old job tried to stick it to me that the labor code did not apply to us back then - we were a commercial organization. And this is a man with a HIGH legal education, damn it.
Mandatory. Once my boss at my old job tried to stick it to me that the labor code did not apply to us back then - we were a commercial organization. And this is a man with a HIGH legal education, damn it.
Response from 0[++++]
Obligations.
Obligations.
Response from 0[+++++]
If employed permanently, MUST. If you are hired on a permanent basis - you MUST NOT, in this case, if necessary, give you a certificate for the time worked.
If employed permanently, MUST. If you are hired on a permanent basis - you MUST NOT, in this case, if necessary, give you a certificate for the time worked.
Response from 0[+++++]
On a mandatory basis and the LLC and IE and all others.No labor agreements legislation does not provide. Only the employment contract!
On a mandatory basis and the LLC and IE and all others.No labor agreements legislation does not provide. Only the employment contract!
Response from 0[++]
This year amendments were made to the LC RF, according to which a private entrepreneur (sole proprietorship, sole proprietorship, etc.), if he has hired workers, must make records in their workbook. In other words, all the necessary documents must be prepared, namely the employment contract and the hiring order.
This year amendments were made to the LC RF, according to which a private entrepreneur (sole proprietorship, sole proprietorship, etc.), if he has hired workers, must make records in their workbook. In other words, all the necessary documents must be prepared, namely the employment contract and the hiring order.
Response from 0[+++++]
Yes, a record in the labor book must be made if the employee has worked for at least 5 days. This record is now required to be made by ALL employers, EXCEPT individual employers. It is specified in part 2 of article 66 of the Labor Code: An employer other than an employer-individuals who are not individual entrepreneurs shall keep employment records books for each employee who has worked for him/her over 5 days, provided the work for such employer is the employee's main job. An exception is when the employee works as a second job: the entry is made only at the request of the employee.
Yes, a record in the labor book must be made if the employee has worked for at least 5 days. This record is now required to be made by ALL employers, EXCEPT individual employers. It is specified in part 2 of article 66 of the Labor Code: An employer other than an employer-individuals who are not individual entrepreneurs shall keep employment records books for each employee who has worked for him/her over 5 days, provided the work for such employer is the employee's main job. An exception is when the employee works as a second job: the entry is made only at the request of the employee.
Response from 0[+++++]
From 06/10/2006 the new wording of the Labor Code of RF came into force, according to which everybody, besides natural persons hiring home workers, has to make a record in the labor booklets, previously only sole proprietorships had to make such records, whereas a LLC is a legal entity and was always obligated to do that!
From 06/10/2006 the new wording of the Labor Code of RF came into force, according to which everybody, besides natural persons hiring home workers, has to make a record in the labor booklets, previously only sole proprietorships had to make such records, whereas a LLC is a legal entity and was always obligated to do that!
Response from 0[+++]
Filling Out a Labor Booklet The Letter of RF Ministry of Health and Social Development of 30.08.2006 #5140-17 says that when filling out a labor booklet to employees by an individual entrepreneur a record about the employment of an employee from the day the individual entrepreneur starts working should be made because it is in the interests of the employee. Accordingly, in this case the dismissal of the employee hired before October 6 is also recorded in the work book as a dismissal. In the absence of the record in the labor book about the employment of the employee hired by the individual entrepreneur before October 6 the record about dismissal of such employee after October 6 has no grounds
Filling Out a Labor Booklet The Letter of RF Ministry of Health and Social Development of 30.08.2006 #5140-17 says that when filling out a labor booklet to employees by an individual entrepreneur a record about the employment of an employee from the day the individual entrepreneur starts working should be made because it is in the interests of the employee. Accordingly, in this case the dismissal of the employee hired before October 6 is also recorded in the work book as a dismissal. In the absence of the record in the labor book about the employment of the employee hired by the individual entrepreneur before October 6 the record about dismissal of such employee after October 6 has no grounds
Response from 0[+]
Yes, of course IE sole proprietors are obliged to make a record in the labor book in connection with the latest changes to the Labor Code of the RF that have taken place this year before the changes were introduced IEs did not make a record in the labor book and were simply obliged to enter into labor contracts.
Yes, of course IE sole proprietors are obliged to make a record in the labor book in connection with the latest changes to the Labor Code of the RF that have taken place this year before the changes were introduced IEs did not make a record in the labor book and were simply obliged to enter into labor contracts.